James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2003-05-15 at 08:17, Colin Ngam wrote: > > Anyway, to make a long story short, we like to "extend" these > > interfaces to return DMA addresses of 64 bits if and when the > > driver has the full capabality to support DAC - via it's > > DMA mask capability setting. > > > > This extention will not break current usages of these interface, > > and as driver changes, this extension will enable platforms to > > support all of it's Physical Memory via the above 2 Interfaces > > without exhausting limited system mapping resources. > > The intent of the dma_alloc_.. was to follow the PCI spec (i.e. lower 32 > bits). However, it does take the GFP_ flags, and thus could be adjusted > to use the region specifier portion of those. Hi James, Do you mean to use the flag parameter to advice that we can return a 64Bit DMA Address? What is a region specifier? Thanks. colin > > > We're currently debating this very issue, since it came up in the > context of the 2.6 must fix list. > > JamesReceived on Thu May 15 08:03:03 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:14 EST