Re: [Linux-ia64] new bitkeeper tree for 2.5 linux/ia64 kernel

From: Keith Owens <kaos_at_ocs.com.au>
Date: 2003-05-15 09:53:56
On Wed, 14 May 2003 10:27:02 -0700, 
David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 14 May 2003 09:37:54 -0400, Jes Sorensen <jes@wildopensource.com> said:
>
>>>>>> "David" == David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com> writes:
>  David> My hidden agenda is of course to encourage more folks to keep
>  David> pushing fixes back to Linus, so that by the time 2.6 comes
>  David> around, the ia64 kernel will build directly from Linus' source
>  David> tree.  We're actually reasonably close at the moment.
>
>  Jes> Just to be sure, your hidden agenda doesn't include a clause about no
>  Jes> longer releasing patches on a regular basis?
>
>Not at all.  BitKeeper isn't Open Source and I'm certainly not going
>to force anybody into using it.

Are you going to set up the automatic patch extraction from this tree,
like ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/ports/ia64/v2.4/testing/cset?
Received on Wed May 14 16:54:21 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:14 EST