Re: [Linux-ia64] libc umount and umount2 can't both be right

Ian Wienand <ianw@gelato.unsw.edu.au> writes:

|> [originally cc: libc-alpha but screwed up the cc line so it was rejected here]
|> 
|> >On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:06:41PM -0400, MONTGOMERY,BOB (HP-FtCollins,ex1) wrote:
|> > In libc, umount and umount2 are the same code.  They both use
|> > syscall number 1044 without introducing a call layer. 
|> 
|> looks like a typo in libc to me
|> 
|> -i
|> ianw@gelato.unsw.edu.au
|> http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au
|> 
|> --- libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ia64/syscalls.list.old 2003-05-14 09:10:04.000000000 +1000
|> +++ libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ia64/syscalls.list     2003-05-14 09:09:40.000000000 +1000
|> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|>  # File name    Caller  Syscall name    # args  Strong name     Weak names
|>   
|> -umount2                -       umount          2       __umount2       umount2
|> +umount2                -       umount2         2       __umount2       umount2

Except there is no umount2 syscall on ia64.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."