Re: [Linux-ia64] libc umount and umount2 can't both be right

From: Ian Wienand <ianw_at_gelato.unsw.edu.au>
Date: 2003-05-14 09:24:05
[originally cc: libc-alpha but screwed up the cc line so it was rejected here]

>On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:06:41PM -0400, MONTGOMERY,BOB (HP-FtCollins,ex1) wrote:
> In libc, umount and umount2 are the same code.  They both use
> syscall number 1044 without introducing a call layer. 

looks like a typo in libc to me

-i
ianw@gelato.unsw.edu.au
http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au

--- libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ia64/syscalls.list.old 2003-05-14 09:10:04.000000000 +1000
+++ libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ia64/syscalls.list     2003-05-14 09:09:40.000000000 +1000
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # File name    Caller  Syscall name    # args  Strong name     Weak names
  
-umount2                -       umount          2       __umount2       umount2
+umount2                -       umount2         2       __umount2       umount2
  
 # Whee! 64-bit systems naturally implement llseek.
 llseek         EXTRA   lseek           C:3     __libc_lseek    __lseek lseek __libc_lseek64 __llseek llseek __lseek64 lseek64
Received on Tue May 13 16:24:12 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:14 EST