On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 08:46:56AM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > >On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 07:02:07PM -0700, David Mosberger wrote: > > > >><hcd_free_dev+0x140> translates into line 1249 in hcd.c, where it > >>does: > >> > >> spin_lock_irqsave (&hcd_data_lock, flags); > >> > >>The deadlock is pretty obvious: the same lock has already been > >>acquired urb_unlink(), 4 levels up in the call-chain. > >> > >>Anybody have a fix for this? > > > > > >David (Brownell, that is), does this help with the trace I sent you a > >few hours ago? > > Seems to be a different problem. The patch below should > resolve the keyboard problem -- just reorders two lines > so the lock isn't held after the device's records get > deleted, so the order is what it should always have been. Applied to my trees, thanks. greg k-hReceived on Fri Apr 18 16:16:52 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:14 EST