Re: [Linux-ia64] Idenitfier clash in read_[un]lock

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab_at_suse.de>
Date: 2003-03-19 20:53:30
David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com> writes:

|> >>>>> On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 15:33:42 +0100, Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> said:
|> 
|>   Andreas> The read_lock and read_unlock macros should not use such
|>   Andreas> innocent variable names like tmp because they have a high
|>   Andreas> probability to clash with (part of) the argument.
|> 
|> Thanks, I applied this patch for 2.5.  In the future, it would be nice
|> if you could send patches that apply with "patch -p1" and if you could
|> specify what kernel the patch is relative to.

Sorry, I'll take more care the next time.

Thanks, Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
Received on Wed Mar 19 01:55:22 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:12 EST