2.4.19-ia64-020821/arch/ia64/kernel/unwind.c, compile_reg() contains case UNW_WHERE_FR: if (rval <= 5) val = unw.preg_index[UNW_REG_F2 + (rval - 1)]; else if (rval >= 16 && rval <= 31) val = unw.preg_index[UNW_REG_F16 + (rval - 16)]; else { opc = UNW_INSN_ADD_SP; val = -sizeof(struct pt_regs); if (rval <= 9) val += struct_offset(struct pt_regs, f6) + 16*(rval - 6); else dprintk("unwind: kernel may not touch f%lu\n", rval); } break; case UNW_WHERE_BR: if (rval >= 1 && rval <= 5) val = unw.preg_index[UNW_REG_B1 + (rval - 1)]; else { opc = UNW_INSN_ADD_SP; val = -sizeof(struct pt_regs); if (rval == 0) val += struct_offset(struct pt_regs, b0); else if (rval == 6) val += struct_offset(struct pt_regs, b6); else val += struct_offset(struct pt_regs, b7); } break; This implicitly assumes that when a fr or br register is required from pt_regs, info->sp is pointing to pt_regs. But info->sp is modified as the code unwinds through each function. The above code only gives correct results for register lookups from the failing function. Unwinding and accessing a fr or br register from earlier functions loads incorrect values for those registers.Received on Mon Dec 09 00:35:24 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:11 EST