RE: [Linux-ia64] New rev 2.1 SDM for Itanium published

From: Jim Hull <jim_hull_at_hp.com>
Date: 2002-11-23 06:02:24
David wrote:

> The ao bit seems to have gotten lost in the final version of SDM2.1.
> It's mentioned (indirectly) in the Document Revision history, but in
> the CPUID[4] description, only "branchlong" and "spontaneous deferral"
> show up.

You're right, the "ao" bit is missing from the final public SDM 2.1.  I
wonder how that happened.  I'll check into this and see if I can get it
fixed.

 -- Jim
Received on Fri Nov 22 11:02:26 2002

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:11 EST