Re: [Linux-ia64] latest glibc snapshot does not build on ia64?

From: Randolph Chung <randolph_at_tausq.org>
Date: 2002-09-04 03:46:43
In reference to a message from Wichmann, Mats D, dated Sep 03:
> 
> > Haven't dug into this too much yet; wanted to see if anyone else has
> > seen this?
> 
> Yup.
> 
> There's a short glibc patch which takes care of this (should be on the
> Debian lists, else I can mail it to you once I get my machine back up).
> It's an "unofficial"  patch because it's felt the problem really lies 
> with binutils and not glibc, so it's not in glibc cvs.   The change
> is to dl-machine.h if it helps search...

there was a IA64_RELOC_NONE patch, but in a different area of glibc...
looks like we just hit it again at a different spot now...


    580   /* ??? Ignore MSB and Instruction format for now.  */
    581   if (R_IA64_FORMAT (r_type) == R_IA64_FORMAT_64LSB)
    582     *reloc_addr = value;
    583   else if (R_IA64_FORMAT (r_type) == R_IA64_FORMAT_32LSB)
    584     *(int *) reloc_addr = value;
    585   else if (r_type == R_IA64_IPLTLSB)
    586     {
    587       reloc_addr[0] = 0;
    588       reloc_addr[1] = 0;
    589     }
    590   else
    591     assert (! "unexpected dynamic reloc format");

r_type is 0 at the assertion 

randolph
Received on Tue Sep 03 10:42:45 2002

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:10 EST