Re: [Linux-ia64] C++ doesn't like asm/atomic.h

From: David Mosberger <davidm_at_napali.hpl.hp.com>
Date: 2002-04-09 06:40:38
>>>>> On Mon, 8 Apr 2002 12:33:40 -0700, Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com> said:

  Gary> David, did you mean to say "... in having glibc not provide
  Gary> ..."?

Nope.  My preference would be for glibc to provide such a header.
Though I see Uli's point about kernel changes.

  Gary> I notice that the *_module(2) man pages which
  Gary> advocate the use of #include <linux/module.h> are installed as
  Gary> part of the modutils package.  Is is possibly "modutils" that
  Gary> should provide the header file that avoids sucking in the
  Gary> possibly problematic kernel-only code.

That certainly would work for me.

	--david
Received on Mon Apr 08 13:42:18 2002

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:08 EST