Re: [Linux-ia64] C++ doesn't like asm/atomic.h

From: David Mosberger <>
Date: 2002-04-09 06:13:29
>>>>> On 08 Apr 2002 12:23:14 -0700, Ulrich Drepper <> said:

  Uli> On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 12:00, David Mosberger wrote:
  >> So you're OK with glibc providing the syscall stubs for
  >> module*(), but not the header files required to use them?

  Uli> Yes.  There is no fundamental problems with this.

I guess I don't really see the harm in having glibc provide a header
for these system call, but as long as the syscall stubs are there,
it's probably not a huge issue in practice.

Received on Mon Apr 08 13:15:09 2002

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:08 EST