> Has anyone seen random SIGILL failures in the strncpy > function in glibc-2.2.4-19.3? > > The failure is caused by a NAT consumption fault in the > code sequence shown below. I've seen NaT consumption faults with an ISV application in a loop involving speculative loads, too. It was very hard to trace back (occured at different simulation times in a huge case) and disappeared after we rewrote the loop and used the latest Intel Fortran compiler. It occured with both B3 and C0 CPUs under 2.4.7 and 2.4.17. I don't have a testcase for this, sorry. Regards, ErichReceived on Wed Apr 03 13:30:49 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:07 EST