On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, David Mosberger wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, 9 Oct 2001 08:01:16 +0200 (CEST), stefan <stefan@lkcc.org> said: > > Stefan> One more question about this: The `ucontext_t' structure > Stefan> seemed to changed a bit over the weeks. Since when is it > Stefan> known to have the sc_ar_bsp member (glibc version) ? > > I thought that member was there pretty much "forever". However, I did > add sc_rbs_base and sc_loadrs recently. This is really for > sigcontext, but since ucontext_t is effectively an alias, it would be > affected, too. I found some ia64 machine which declares `mcontext_t' in <sys/ucontext.h> in another way as `sigcontext' in <bits/sigcontext.h>. That is dated on May 22nd this year. With members like `ar_bsp_base' and `ar_bspstore'... That is why I ask. Thanks in advance, stefan@lkcc.orgReceived on Thu Oct 11 04:34:11 2001
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:05 EST