Re: [Linux-ia64] toolchain status

From: H . J . Lu <hjl_at_valinux.com>
Date: 2000-11-18 04:01:10
On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 03:55:30PM +0100, Francis Galiegue wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, H . J . Lu wrote:
> 
> > > > There is no DT_INIT_ARRAY in libc.so. Even if there is DT_INIT_ARRAY,
> > > > I still don't know how to use it to tell where DT_INIT points to.
> > > 
> > > Easy enough -- you know from DT_PLTGOT what the GP is for the DSO.
> > > If *(long *)(DT_INIT + 8) == GP, then you can assume that DT_INIT
> > > is a descriptor instead of an offset.
> > > 
> > 
> > Thanks. This patch seems to work for me.
> > 
> 
> I don't know which version this patch is supposed to apply to, but it doesn't
> apply as is on the stock FSF tree. "Corrected" patch for this tree is attached,
> in case it is of interest for someone.

Your patch looks wrong. Please check out the glibc 2.2 from CVS again.


-- 
H.J. Lu (hjl@valinux.com)
Received on Fri Nov 17 09:01:11 2000

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:00 EST