Re: [Linux-ia64] Re: gdb null ptr

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin_at_redhat.com>
Date: 2000-11-08 10:38:43
Jim Blandy <jimb@cygnus.com> writes:

> I don't think limiting the caching to C++ programs solves the problem.
> 
> If I understand the situation, the SGI compiler attaches a DW_AT_name
> attribute to array types.  We don't know whether this behavior occurs
> only in C compilation units, or in C++ compilation units as well.
> 
> If the SGI compiler emits bogus names for array types in C++ code too,
> then the same bug will reappear when debugging C++ code, even with
> this patch applied.
> 
> I think the change to tag_type_to_type needs to be reverted
> altogether.  I understand that it provides substantial savings in
> storage, but it's simply not correct.

I'll revert it.

Okay, but we could still cache symbols and psymbols, that we have a
mangled name for, without any issues, in C++.

We could also cache most types in C++, using the mangled names of the
always existing operator or copy constructor that must be present in
the type, as the hash key.
This won't work for non-structs/classes, but we'll just not cache
them.

Anytime we have a mangled name we can use, we can cache using it,
since it's guaranteed to be unique.

--Dan
Received on Tue Nov 07 15:38:48 2000

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:00 EST