Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes: > On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes: >> >> >> I strongly disagree from my recent day-job experience. [Explains a >> >> convincing use case in favour of cd-up.] >> > >> > Hmm. I have to think about that. But a consequence of what you suggest >> > would be to disallow git-apply outside of a repository, because then you >> > would introduce _another_ inconsistency (git-apply without --index would >> > behave differently when inside a repo than when outside of one). >> >> Why? git-apply outside is like 'patch' isn't it? > > So, why shouldn't it be the same inside? That's the inconsistency I am > alluding to. It appears that you are saying we cannot make it consistent in both ways, and you are probably right. I think git should cater first to git users who use git in git repositories, which means consistency inside a git repository between with --index and without is more important. We can certainly teach 'git apply' without --index/--cache a new "stay where you are" option to behave like patch (but do that only without --index/--cache) inside a git repository for special cases. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Sun Feb 18 13:10:45 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2007-02-18 13:12:43 EST