Re: Dangers of working on a tracking branch

From: Shawn O. Pearce <>
Date: 2007-02-16 09:09:18
Bill Lear <> wrote:
> On Thursday, February 15, 2007 at 16:58:16 (-0500) Jeff King writes:
> >On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 03:53:01PM -0600, Bill Lear wrote:
> >> Sure, it is easy, but it's surprising to (our) users when they
> >> do a clone and can't "jump right in", and have to spend 3 seconds
> >> doing the above...
> >
> >Fair enough. It should be pretty simple to implement; why don't you try
> >working up a patch? :)
> Well, I seriously thought about it, but the git-clone code is pretty
> dense.  It might be educational though, and since I'm the only one
> who wants it ... might be worth a shot.


Lets say you patch git-clone to create these branches under
refs/heads, and also under refs/remotes/origin.  Now someone else
modifies one of those branches, and you do a git-fetch to get the
latest.  The tracking branch under refs/remotes/origin would update,
but not the one in refs/heads.  Which means "jumping right in" may
actually cost you a lot more time, because you are now starting on
something that is several days old.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Fri Feb 16 09:09:36 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2007-02-16 09:15:55 EST