Hi, On Sat, 10 Feb 2007, Marco Costalba wrote: > On 2/10/07, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote: > > On Sat, 10 Feb 2007, Marco Costalba wrote: > > > On 2/10/07, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Marco Costalba wrote: > > > > > > > > > I just need to know if current working directory is clean and report > > > > > back to qgit user, so read-only access would be ok for me. > > [... talking about a patch to introduce --refresh to git-status ...] > > Well, I tested the patch and indeed it helps a lot ;-) Not really. The thing is, git-status does a lot more than what you need. And what you need is _only_ what "git diff --name-only HEAD" does already! It _also_ checks the index, it _also_ only checks the files with different stat information, but it does _not_ try to update the index and prepare a message to be displayed when committing. So, what is the big problem about accepting that patching git-status for one obscure use is wrong, wrong, wrong, when git-diff already does what is needed??? Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Sun Feb 11 02:09:44 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2007-02-11 02:13:30 EST