Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Santi Béjar wrote: > >> when a reflog entry do not have a reflog message the refs@{num} syntax >> gives a different result than with 'git log -g'. Actually 'git log -g' >> just skips this ref. > > I could be that some older git version produces empty messages. But I'd > regard the empty messages to be the problem. Or is the current Git version > still producing such entries? StGIT used to produce no reflog messages; I don't know if this has improved. But you can have old reflog entries with empty messages; git log -g should deal with them IMHO. -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Fri Feb 09 06:44:21 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2007-02-09 06:48:39 EST