"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org> writes: > I almost submitted a patch to do that tonight, but I couldn't decide > on behavior: should we scan known packs, then try for loose, then > scan packs again until no object or no new pack is found? Probably. Hmmm. Probably. But I tend to think that this particular failure scenario is probably rare enough that plugging this in "the right way" is not a high priority. We should definitely revisit it post 1.5.0. Also if we are adding a bitfield, I think pack_local should also become one, as it currently wastes a whole word to hold one bit (on the other hand if we do not want to add a field I think a different negative value in pack_fd could mean "do not bother to look at it again"). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Sat Feb 03 16:48:29 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2007-02-03 16:50:15 EST