Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote: > > I wonder what the difference is between NO_MMAP=Yes and NO_MMAP= > > on Windows. > Cygwin: > real 0m0.812s > and > real 0m2.094s > > IOW, the numbers are slightly worse (!) than with mmap(). Slightly? That's double the time! > MinGW does not even have mmap(). But Windows has something almost there. I just read a flame war thread about implementing mmap in libiberty for MinGW by stealing source from Cygwin, and how the FSF might feel about someone's dirty feet after playing rugby. Yea... Google is good. :) -- Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Wed Jan 31 03:29:24 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2007-01-31 03:31:00 EST