Hi, On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > > > Just curious, but were these tests run with mmap(), or NO_MMAP? > > > > Both with NO_MMAP=YesPlease. > > I wonder what the difference is between NO_MMAP=Yes and NO_MMAP= > on Windows. Cygwin: $ time git-rev-list next >/dev/null real 0m0.812s user 0m0.358s sys 0m0.203s $ time git-rev-list next >/dev/null real 0m0.797s user 0m0.358s sys 0m0.234s $ time git-rev-list next >/dev/null real 0m0.845s user 0m0.390s sys 0m0.265s and $ time git-log next >/dev/null real 0m2.094s user 0m0.718s sys 0m1.077s $ time git-log next >/dev/null real 0m2.078s user 0m0.718s sys 0m1.062s $ time git-log next >/dev/null real 0m2.124s user 0m0.796s sys 0m1.046s IOW, the numbers are slightly worse (!) than with mmap(). MinGW does not even have mmap(). Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Wed Jan 31 03:13:49 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2007-01-31 03:15:19 EST