Re: MinGW port usable

From: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Date: 2007-01-31 02:18:03
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> On the git repository, using MinGW:
> Using cygwin:
> 
> IOW MinGW wins hands down with an average 0.33s vs cygwin with an average 
> 0.75s. (I am fairly certain that you must not trust sys times.)

Just curious, but were these tests run with mmap(), or NO_MMAP?

Clearly, for a packed repository most of the overhead should be
in getting to the pack data itself (as everything else is pure
userspace).

-- 
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Wed Jan 31 02:19:15 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2007-01-31 02:21:18 EST