Re: More precise tag following

From: Simon 'corecode' Schubert <corecode@fs.ei.tum.de>
Date: 2007-01-28 06:12:05
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>> Okay, let's try to assume for now that nobody said "git blame".  
>> Instead let's say:
>>
>> git rev-list and git log (with or without -p) perform poorly when 
>> invoked with a pathspec.
> 
> So what? You _will_ be interested in the _newest_ changes _99%_ of the 
> time. And for these you don't need to wait 1:18, but 0:00.01 or so.

not if you are interested which commit introduced/changed a particular line.

>> This particular file has 64 revisions.  However there are ~ 375000 
>> revisions in the converted repo.
> 
> "file version" trap! "file version" trap! "file version" trap!

call it path and retry.

-- 
Serve - BSD     +++  RENT this banner advert  +++    ASCII Ribbon   /"\
Work - Mac      +++  space for low €€€ NOW!1  +++      Campaign     \ /
Party Enjoy Relax   |   http://dragonflybsd.org      Against  HTML   \
Dude 2c 2 the max   !   http://golden-apple.biz       Mail + News   / \


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Received on Sun Jan 28 06:12:49 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2007-01-28 06:14:34 EST