Hi, On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > Then that would mean 250 calls to git-for-each-ref, wouldn't it? > > Well, I think it was Johannes that said once for each ref. But either > which way, it's a totally unacceptable load with resulting unacceptable > latency. No. I would never say that you have to run for-each-ref for each ref. That's plain stupid. BTW I take some satisfaction in that you finally agreed (in another email) that some post-creation caching is necessary. I would be even more satisfied if you finally agreed that it is a good practice to separate conceptually different things, and not continued ad infinitum (and ad nauseam) arguing that .git/info/refs should serve dumb transports, and gitweb, and eventually bring peace to everybody on this planet. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Fri Jan 26 10:34:24 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2007-01-26 10:39:08 EST