"Alex Riesen" <raa.lkml@gmail.com> writes: > On 1/10/07, Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote: >> This comes on top of yours. >> >> I'm reproducing all the merges in linux-2.6 history to make sure >> the base one, yours and this produce the same result (the same >> clean merge, or the same unmerged index and the same diff from >> HEAD). So far it is looking good. > > Yep. Tried the monster merge on it: 1m15sec on that small laptop. Is that supposed to be a good news? It sounds awfully slow. > For whatever reason your patch left an "if (cache_dirty) flush_cache()", > that's after my patch + yours. Had it removed. That's because my copy of "your patch" has the fix-up I suggested to remove the flush from process_renames() already -- the removal of that one and removal from process_entry() you did logically belong to each other. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Thu Jan 11 11:35:07 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2007-01-11 11:36:53 EST