Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes: > On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Jakub Narebski wrote: > >> Johannes Schindelin wrote: >> ... >> > My reasoning is that invalid entries should rather be ignored than be >> > taken into account. So, to verify that you are not walking invalid data, >> > you have to parse it anyway. >> >> I think that Junio was talking about the fact, that if you for example >> do need only refname and sha1, there is no need to parse object at all. >> If you don't need to, don't parse. > > And it was exactly what _I_ was talking about, too: > > if there are invalid entries, you ignore them. So for example, if there is > no timestamp and message, you don't want the osha1 or nsha1, because it is > an _invalid_ record. That's fine. I applied your patch with minimum fixups so that it does not make the surviving records _invalid_ ones after "reflog expire" runs ;-). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Wed Jan 10 07:22:30 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2007-01-10 07:26:49 EST