Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > On Wednesday 13 December 2006 23:00, Andy Parkins wrote: >> Hello, >> >> With all the discussion about user interface difficulties, I started to >> write a comparison with subversion document. (I was assuming that people >> find subversion easy). As much as I love git, I was expecting to find that >> it's hard to use interface would have subversion as the clear winner. I >> was hoping that would then give guidance as to what could be fixed in git. >> >> I was surprised, therefore, to find that in each case I was finding that >> git was the winner. > > subversion is a winner when it comes to options handling (especially --help) > and better (error) messages. That's one of reason why people find it easy. > Yup. Most discussions about what git can do to improve usually ends up in a patch that fixes either documentation or error- / help-messages. > ps. I'm blind or there is no documentation about what utilities are needed to > get git fully working? (like sed, coreutils, grep, rcs package (merge tool > afaik needed)...). > perl and the standard coreutils, which afaik are required to be present on all unix systems. We no longer require external merge tools. -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Fri Dec 15 09:08:53 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-12-15 09:11:28 EST