Re: [RFC] Submodules in GIT

From: Martin Waitz <tali@admingilde.org>
Date: 2006-12-03 07:21:03
hoi :)

On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 11:52:13AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I don't think it would be wrong at all to have a "link object" type, and 
> have the "link" tree entry actually point to that "link object" instead of 
> pointing directly to the commit in the submodule.
> 
> And yes, that extra indirection would allow for more flexibility (the 
> "link object" can contain comments about the particular version used, 
> pointers to where you can get it - whether human-readable or strictly 
> meant for automation - etc etc).

What makes a submodule so special that now we suddenly have to store
those stuff in the object database?

Storing a fetch location would grossly contradict the distributed nature
of git.  I really do not see _any_ reason to store more information than
the commit sha1 of the submodule.

-- 
Martin Waitz

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Received on Sun Dec 03 07:21:18 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-12-03 07:29:36 EST