On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 01:59:03PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jan Harkes <jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu> writes: > > > The following patch does fix the problem Nicolas reported, but for some > > reason I'm still getting only 102 objects (only tags and the commits > > they refer to?) with your test. > > One potential downside of this is that this makes an obscure but > useful "gitk --unpacked" useless (robs performance). > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/19197/focus=19207 If I use 'git fetch' followed later on by a 'git fetch -k', the result from --unpacked would not include the unpacked objects created by the first fetch. Although it may have been fast, it seems to be somewhat counter-intuitive. > But other than that, I think it is an Ok change. The original > semantics of --unpacked (with or without "pretend as if objects > in this pack are loose") were, eh, "strange". Do you need a resend with a proper 'Signed-Off-By' line? Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Tue Oct 31 09:55:13 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-10-31 09:58:37 EST