hoi :) On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 03:30:47PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Martin Waitz <tali@admingilde.org> writes: > > > Instead of providing the project as a ?p= parameter it is simply appended > > to the base URI. > > All other parameters are appended to that, except for ?a=summary which > > is the default and can be omitted. > > Supporting PATH_INFO in the sense that we do sensible things > when we get called with one is one thing, but generating such a > URL that uses PATH_INFO is a different thing. I suspect not > everybody's webserver is configured to call us with PATH_INFO, > so this should be conditional. right, and in fact it was more intended as a RFC, to see what people think about such a thing. Obviously I wanted to have it for my repository, so I implemented it unconditional first. Should we use the gitweb feature mechanism to enable/disable PATH_INFO URL generation? -- Martin Waitz - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-10-01 04:15:06 EST