Re: git and time

From: A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com>
Date: 2006-09-29 08:25:42
Matthew L Foster wrote:
> --- A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Sounds like you're suggesting that Git should not record any timestamps 
>> at all. After all, Git doesn't need them.
> 
> Yeah kind of, since distributed git doesn't need timestamps and can't guarantee them the only time
> that might make any sense to use locally is local commit time. 

There is no local commit time for things you get from a remote repository.

When I wrote "Sounds like you're suggesting that Git should not record 
any timestamps at all", I meant _you_ don't think Git should record 
_any_ timestamps since they can't be guaranteed to match the DAG.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Fri Sep 29 08:26:30 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-09-29 08:27:13 EST