Matthew L Foster wrote: > --- A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Sounds like you're suggesting that Git should not record any timestamps >> at all. After all, Git doesn't need them. > > Yeah kind of, since distributed git doesn't need timestamps and can't guarantee them the only time > that might make any sense to use locally is local commit time. There is no local commit time for things you get from a remote repository. When I wrote "Sounds like you're suggesting that Git should not record any timestamps at all", I meant _you_ don't think Git should record _any_ timestamps since they can't be guaranteed to match the DAG. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Fri Sep 29 08:26:30 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-09-29 08:27:13 EST