Re: git pull for update of netdev fails.

From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>
Date: 2006-09-23 23:15:01
On 23/09/06, Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> wrote:
> Dear diary, on Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 06:00:35AM CEST, I got a letter
> where Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> said that...
> > I can see the same concept of ref history being useful even for
> > core git-rebase and doing it this way would also give it to StGIT
> > without Catalin needing to change code.
>
> In my StGIT tree, I don't want to have arbitrary N-days cutoff point,
> I want all the patches history preserved at least as long as I carry
> the patch, because it's just as valuable as the "regular" project
> history to me.

That's how it currently works (the top of the log is in
refs/patches/<branch>/<patch>.log). I gave up the idea of using
reflogs for patch history.

-- 
Catalin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Sat Sep 23 23:15:09 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-09-23 23:15:50 EST