Re: [PATCH (take 2)] gitweb: Do not parse refs by hand, use git-peek-remote instead

From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: 2006-09-15 16:15:31
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:

> This is in response to Linus work on packed refs. Additionally it
> makes gitweb work with symrefs, too.
>
> Do not parse refs by hand, using File::Find and reading individual
> heads to get hash of reference, but use git-peek-remote output
> instead.

Looks nicer.  Will apply.

Now, once we start doing this, it may make sense to rethink how
this function and git_get_references functions are used.  I
think

	git grep -n -e '^sub ' \
        	-e git_get_references \
                -e git_get_refs_list gitweb/gitweb.perl

would be instructive how wasteful the current code is.

get_refs_list is called _TWICE_ in git_summary and worse yet
very late in the function, after calling git_get_references that
could already have done what the function does (by the way,
git_get_references already knows how to use peek-remote output
but for some reason it uses ls-remote -- I think you can safely
rewrite it to use peek-remote).  So you end up doing peek-remote
three times to draw the summary page.

git_get_references are called from almost everywhere that shows
the list of commits, which is understandable because we would
want to see those markers in the list.

I very much suspect that you can use git_get_refs_list to return
a hash and a sorted list at the same time from the same input
and make git_summary to do with just a single call to it, and
get rid of git_get_references with a little bit of restructuring
of the caller.

Hmm?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Fri Sep 15 16:16:07 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-09-15 16:16:47 EST