Re: [PATCH 0/7] gitweb: Trying to improve history view speed

From: Junio C Hamano <>
Date: 2006-09-09 19:10:23
Jakub Narebski <> writes:

> Jakub Narebski wrote:
>> Shortlog:
>>  [PATCH 1/7] gitweb: Make pickaxe search a feature
>>  [PATCH 2/7] gitweb: Paginate history output
>>  [PATCH 3/7] gitweb: Use @hist_opts as git-rev-list parameters
>>              in git_history
>>  [PATCH 4/7] gitweb: Add parse_rev_list for later use
>>  [PATCH 5/7] gitweb: Use parse_rev_list in git_shortlog and git_history
>>  [PATCH 6/7] gitweb: Assume parsed revision list in git_shortlog_body
>>              and git_history_body
>>  [PATCH 7/7] gitweb: Set page to 0 if it is not defined, in git_history
> Should I resend corrected patch 1 (Make pickaxe search a feature; but
> default to on), and patches 2 and 7 as one patch (Paginate history output)?

I looked at and understood 1 and 2+7, although I cannot claim I
looked at 2+7 deeply enough; cursory look told me they should be
Ok.  So is 3, but I suspect gitweb without --full-history might
surprise some users.

I do not know about 4, 5 and 6.  I didn't look at them at all
the first time you sent them out, since I got an impression that
you did not understand how git-rev-list was supposed to work
when you did them.

Now Linus explained it to you, I suspect they would probably
need to be rethought?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Sat Sep 09 19:10:02 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-09-09 19:10:52 EST