Re: What does "properly support iconv" in git Makefile (NO_ICONV) mean?

From: Jakub Narebski <>
Date: 2006-09-05 09:26:56
On Tue, Sep 05 2006 at 01:16, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 01:08:57AM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote:
>> To add autoconf support for checking if NO_ICONV has to be defined
>> (Define NO_ICONV if your libc does not properly support iconv.)
>> one needs to know what does "properly support iconv" mean.
>> The commit message of a commit which introduced this compilation 
>> variable (commit b6e56eca8a4eb74a86e9f2d99aa480c665458aa7) tells:
>>     Systems using some uClibc versions do not properly support
>>     iconv stuff.
>> At what exactly iconv fail? What should the test to put in
>> check?
> As far as I know, iconv stuff is not supported on uClibc. Thats the
> reason I sent the patch. Gentoo bug #115826 [1].
> You should probably set it if you are building for uClibc. Not sure
> how you'd test that in though.
> [1]

Gaah, I have some problems accessing the Gentoo bug database.
Is the problem that iconv does not exist in libc, or it exist but 
Jakub Narebski
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Tue Sep 05 09:27:22 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-09-05 09:27:58 EST