On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 03:54:19PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > I tested git-merge-recur vs. git-merge-recursive on the linux-2.6 > repository last night. It contains 2298 two-head merges. _All_ of them > come out identically with -recur as compared to -recursive (looking at > the resulting index only). After the latest updates to git-merge-recur it passes all the tests I have too. > That was the good news. The bad news is: it _seems_, that -recur is only > about 6x faster than -recursive, not 10x, and this number becomes smaller, > the longer the merge takes. So I see a startup effect here, probably. That is a quite nice improvement anyway :) - Fredrik - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Sat Aug 19 20:47:12 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-08-19 20:47:46 EST