Hi, On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes: > > > With this option, the changed words are shown inline. For example, > > if a file containing "This is foo" is changed to "This is bar", the diff > > will now show "This is " in plain text, "foo" in red, and "bar" in green. > > > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> > > This looks sooooooooooo strange (and I do not particularly like > colours, so I am biased). I thought so, too, after playing around with wdiff. But I do use it regularly, and it is helpful. It is my equivalent to the word processor option to show all changes (yes, live and in colour). > We might want to disable it when the output would not be colored under > diff.color = auto, at least, but if the user asks to shoot himself in > the foot that is fine as well ;-). At the moment, this is _only_ enabled when the user explicitely asks for it: no --color-words, no word colours. Do you want to be able to say "git-diff --color-words | patch -p1 -R"? Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Mon Jul 31 21:04:24 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-07-31 21:06:30 EST