hoi :) thanks for the feedback! > I don't like it. While this method works, it is too much effort > to have to run make to do this, plus it pollutes your tree. Do you really think it is that much effort? What do others think? alternatives? > Instead, what you can do is make gitweb.cgi read a text file > from . which has those variables defined. I don't really care if it is a configuration file or a build-time configuration, but I need something now. If you submit your proposal, we can compare both and choose the best one ;-). > This way, I can just copy gitweb.cgi into my web-server directory > and voila it works, since the variable definition file would > always be there. This way: > - no need to run make to build "gitweb.cgi" or "gitweb.pl" whatever > you call it, ok, but you have to call make anyway to build the rest of GIT, so this shouldn't be a big problem. > - no need to pollute your tree with site defined variables, this is achieved by my patch, too. > - simple copy (cp) would install a working version, instead of > the current cp + patch with local settings method. this is achieved by my patch, too. -- Martin Waitz - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-07-31 17:23:07 EST