Re : 2 questions on git-send-email usage

From: moreau francis <francis_moreau2000@yahoo.fr>
Date: 2006-07-11 18:46:35
moreau francis wrote:
> (please let me CCed when replying)
>  
>  2006/7/10, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>:
>  > moreau francis wrote:
>  > 
>  > > I'm wondering what am I supposed to answer when git-send-email
>  > > is asking me :
>  > >
>  > > Message-ID to be used as In-Reply-To for the first email?
>  > >
>  > > I'm running this command:
>  > >
>  > > $ git-send-email --no-signed-off-by-cc --no-chain-reply-to --to \
>  > >   foo@bar.com --compose /tmp/patch/
>  > >
>  > > to write an introductory message, and all patches are sent as replies to
>  > > this introductory email sent.
>  > 
>  > Empty string (i.e. RET) should do if you don't want to attach your series of
>  > patches somewhere in existing thread.
>  
>  ok I'll try
>  
>  --in-reply-to ""

ok it works. But wouldn't it make more sense to have by default --in-reply-to ""
when --compose is set ? That would mean "by default all patches are sent
as replies to the email I'm composing" which is usely what happens, no ?

>  
>  > 
>  > > I also noticed that git-send-email removes the commit message of each
>  > > patches I sent, I don't think this is the normal behaviour though. What
>  > > am I missing ?
>  > 
>  > Are patches formatted using git-format-patch?
>  > 
>  
>  yes
>  

I think I have found out a clue. The commit message and Signed-off-by are
missing because the header patches are formatted like this:
Received on Tue Jul 11 18:47:12 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-07-11 18:47:39 EST