moreau francis wrote: > (please let me CCed when replying) > > 2006/7/10, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>: > > moreau francis wrote: > > > > > I'm wondering what am I supposed to answer when git-send-email > > > is asking me : > > > > > > Message-ID to be used as In-Reply-To for the first email? > > > > > > I'm running this command: > > > > > > $ git-send-email --no-signed-off-by-cc --no-chain-reply-to --to \ > > > foo@bar.com --compose /tmp/patch/ > > > > > > to write an introductory message, and all patches are sent as replies to > > > this introductory email sent. > > > > Empty string (i.e. RET) should do if you don't want to attach your series of > > patches somewhere in existing thread. > > ok I'll try > > --in-reply-to "" ok it works. But wouldn't it make more sense to have by default --in-reply-to "" when --compose is set ? That would mean "by default all patches are sent as replies to the email I'm composing" which is usely what happens, no ? > > > > > > I also noticed that git-send-email removes the commit message of each > > > patches I sent, I don't think this is the normal behaviour though. What > > > am I missing ? > > > > Are patches formatted using git-format-patch? > > > > yes > I think I have found out a clue. The commit message and Signed-off-by are missing because the header patches are formatted like this:Received on Tue Jul 11 18:47:12 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-07-11 18:47:39 EST