Re: [RFC+PATCH 1/1] Move SCM interoperability tools into scm/

From: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Date: 2006-07-10 08:13:26
Dear diary, on Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 11:26:59PM CEST, I got a letter
where Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com> said that...
> So I have to ask... what are the expected benefits of the move?

I've been meaning to do something like this for some time already; my
itch have been the builtins. The tree size _is_ getting out of hand and
a little more categorization of the sources would certainly help.
Although I'd take a different approach:

	libgit/
	builtin/
	standalone/
	scripts/

> In any case, use /interop instead. /scm in the tree of an SCM could be
> anything ;-)

I agree on this point.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
Snow falling on Perl. White noise covering line noise.
Hides all the bugs too. -- J. Putnam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Mon Jul 10 08:14:07 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-07-10 08:15:05 EST