Re: [RFC+PATCH 1/1] Move SCM interoperability tools into scm/

From: Martin Langhoff <>
Date: 2006-07-10 07:26:59
On 7/9/06, Ryan Anderson <> wrote:
> This is the first in a series to categorize the source tree a little bit more
> than it is currently.

Given that you title it RFC, I guess it hasn't been discussed before.
I personally don't see much benefit from the move/rename. The tree is
not so large, the SCM import/export utilities are a single file each
and their names are quite clear. Having /contrib is more an issue of
marking utilities there as 'new, experimental, unsupported', and the
assumption is that when something matures it moves out of /contrib.

So I have to ask... what are the expected benefits of the move?

In any case, use /interop instead. /scm in the tree of an SCM could be
anything ;-)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Mon Jul 10 07:27:35 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-07-10 07:28:01 EST