Re: [PATCH] Additional merge-base tests

From: A Large Angry SCM <>
Date: 2006-07-06 00:28:25
Josef Weidendorfer wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 July 2006 23:15, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Johannes Schindelin <> writes:
>>> We could introduce a time.maximumSkew variable, and just walk only 
>>> that much further when traversing the commits.
>> We could have had "commit generation number" in the commit
>> object header, and use that instead of commit timestamps for
>> these traversal purposes.
> Isn't this "commit generation number" information that can be
> regenerated on the fly, i.e. a perfect fit for data to be stored
> in a persistant cache, e.g. in ".git/tmp/virtual-commit-timestamps"?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Thu Jul 06 00:29:03 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-07-06 00:29:29 EST