Re: [RFC] Cache negative delta pairs

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:

> On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> 
>> The negative delta cache concept is certainly attractive even for normal 
>> repositories, especially for public servers, since when used in 
>> conjonction with delta reuse it makes the creation of a pack basically 
>> free.  So I think this idea really has merits, as long as the cache 
>> remains small.
>
> I don't really see much of a point of this all.
>
> Instead of having a separate cache, wouldn't it be much better to just 
> take the hint from the previous pack-file?
>
> In the repacking window, if both objects we are looking at already came 
> from the same (old) pack-file, don't bother delta'ing them against each 
> other. 
>
> That means that we'll still always check for better deltas for (and 
> against!) _unpacked_ objects, but assuming incremental repacks, you'll 
> avoid the delta creation 99% of the time.
>
> Ie somethng really simple like the appended.
>
> 		Linus
> ---
> diff --git a/pack-objects.c b/pack-objects.c
> index bed2497..cea63e7 100644
> --- a/pack-objects.c
> +++ b/pack-objects.c
> @@ -988,6 +988,13 @@ static int try_delta(struct unpacked *tr
>  		return -1;
>  
>  	/*
> +	 * We do not bother to try a delta that we discarded
> +	 * on an earlier try
> +	 */
> +	if (trg_entry->in_pack && trg_entry->in_pack == src_entry->in_pack)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	/*

I think you meant to return 0 from here though.  -1 means "do
not use this pair and do not bother try improving it with the
remaining candidates".


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html