On 5/15/06, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote: > > > qgit would seem to prefer to have the commit counting only affect the > "primary" commits, and not the "boundary" ones at all. Which might be > sensible, but it's not the semantics it has now. > > gitk doesn't care, because it uses the boundary commits just as hints. > $ git-rev-list --topo-order --after="Apr 10" --before="Apr 11" HEAD |wc 14 14 574 $ git-rev-list --topo-order --boundary --after="Apr 10" --before="Apr 11" HEAD |wc 18 18 742 Boundary revisions in this case are _not_ passed through search filtering. Using --boundary option we get revisions ouside given filter range. This does not apply to our previous example. So at least --boundary behaviour it's a little bit inconsistent at the moment. Marco - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Tue May 16 04:33:46 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-05-16 04:34:08 EST