Re: Implementing branch attributes in git config

Hello, Johannes!

On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 03:05 +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> The ["blablabla"] syntax fails the is-it-obvious-what-this-does test. What 
> *is* wrong with the " for " syntax? IIRC it was even proposed by you, and 
> it happens to be backward compatible.

Not trying to answer for Linus, here's my take.

The "for" syntax is one more layer in the config hierarchy.  Adding
another layer is a more intrusive solution than relaxing the syntax of
the existing elements without changing their semantic.

git-repo-config is "for" agnostic.  It doesn't parse "for" (as far as I
know).

"for" can be confusing in some contexts, or may force inversion of the
hierarchy to make the config file more readable.  How would you
implement branch descriptions?  See this:

[branchdata]
description = "netdev" for "Network device development"

and this

[branchdata]
description = "Network device development" for "netdev"

The later is closer to English.  Or should we use the first approach and
"is" instead of "for"?

Now, how can I get a description for the "netdev" branch by one
git-repo-config command, without pipes?

-- 
Regards,
Pavel Roskin

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html