Re: Unresolved issues #2 (shallow clone again)

Linus Torvalds wrote:

> So what you'd get is a _really_ cut down history that doesn't contain any
> commit history at all (just distinct "points in commit history time"), but
> that _does_ contain all the objects that the commits point to.

So we would get 'skin-deep clone' rather than 'shallow' one?

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html