On Wed, 3 May 2006 12:47:32 -0400 Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> wrote: > Of course, a lot of it is that git *is* much more powerful, much like > the difference between a stickshift with a racing clutch (git) and a > car with an automatic transmission (hg). So maybe one thing that > would help git would be a stronger emphasis of cogito for those > projects that don't need the full power of using git "straight up". The docs and higher-level user commands can still use some work, but telling people they have to install and learn an entire extra layer isn't going to win many converts. Personally I think Git needs a bit more polish and to stop thinking of itself as mostly plumbing. Even so Git really has become pretty good at making simple things simple: init-db, add/rm, commit -a, status, show, log, gitk, diff, branch, checkout, clone, fetch/pull The fact that it's faster, requires less disk space, and has all the lower level tools you need to do "complex stuff", should make it a tempting choice once the remaining rough edges are removed. But there is nothing inherently complex about Git. Sean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Thu May 04 04:50:46 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-05-04 04:51:05 EST