Re: 1.3.0 creating bigger packs than 1.2.3

From: Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Date: 2006-04-21 01:03:15
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Shawn Pearce wrote:
> 
> > Apparently I have created a repository which v1.2.3 packs about 50%
> > smaller than 'next' does:
> > 
> >   v1.2.3 (tag):
> >    60M pack-7f766f5af5547554bacb28c0294bd562589dc5e7.pack
> > 
> >   1.2.3.gf3a4 (an older 'next'):
> >   128M pack-7f766f5af5547554bacb28c0294bd562589dc5e7.pack
> > 
> >   1.3.0.rc4.g8060 (a fairly recent 'next'):
> >   118M pack-7f766f5af5547554bacb28c0294bd562589dc5e7.pack
> > 
> > Repeated packing with 1.3.0.rc4.g8060 doesn't seem to change the
> > size of the pack file, its pretty consistent at 118M.
> 
> First try "git repack -a -d f", where the "-f" is the magic one.
> 
> Without the -f, git repack will re-use old pack information, which is much 
> much faster, but not as space-efficient.
> 
> If that doesn't help, it might be time to look at the actual repo, but try 
> that first.

So with 1.3.0.g56c1 "git repack -a -d -f" did worse:

  Total 46391, written 46391 (delta 6649), reused 39742 (delta 0)
  129M pack-7f766f5af5547554bacb28c0294bd562589dc5e7.pack

I just tried -f on v1.2.3 and it did slightly better then before:

  Total 46391, written 46391 (delta 6847), reused 38012 (delta 0)
   59M pack-7f766f5af5547554bacb28c0294bd562589dc5e7.pack

-- 
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Fri Apr 21 01:03:54 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-04-21 01:04:20 EST