Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 10:49:04PM CEST, I got a letter where Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> said that... > Peter Baumann <peter.baumann@gmail.com> writes: > > > Another question. I'd like to create a totaly independent branch (like > > the "todo" branch in git). Is there a more user friendly way than doing > > > > git-checkout -b todo > > rm .git/refs/heads/todo > > rm .git/index > > rm <all_files_in_your_workdir> > > > > ... hack hack hack ... > > git-commit -a > > > > I looked all over the docs, but can't find anything obvious. > > My "todo" branch is not even part of my main git repository. I > just have two independent repositories (git and todo) locally, > and push into the same public repository. Wouldn't it be better to separate it to two distinct public repositories as well? It's confusing people and encouraging a practice that really isn't very feasible and practical in Git. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ Right now I am having amnesia and deja-vu at the same time. I think I have forgotten this before. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Sun Apr 09 06:57:24 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-04-09 06:57:39 EST